社会经济地位与老年人健康结构研究(英文版)(云南大学西南边疆少数民族研究中心文库·社会发展与社会治理系列)
上QQ阅读APP看书,第一时间看更新

1.2.2 Proximal Factor: The Mechanism of SES-health by Healthy Lifestyle

Sufficient evidences have shown that health-related lifestyles could partly explain health differentials by SES.Borg V, &Kristensen TS.(2000). “Social class and self-rated health: can the gradient be explained by differences in life style or work environment? ”Social Science and Medicine,51(7): 1019-30. Molarius A, Berglund K, Eriksson C, Lambe M, Nordstrom E, &Eriksson HG, et al.(2007). “Socioeconomic conditions, lifestyle factors, and self-rated health among men and women in Sweden”. European Journal of Public Health,17(2): 125-33. People with high SES are characterized by greater consumption of high-quality and low-fat diets.Vlismas K, Stavrinos V, &Panagiotakos DB.(2009). “Socio-economic status, dietary habits and health-related outcomes in various parts of the world: a review”. Central European Journal of Public Health,17(2): 55-63. TurrellG, & Kavanagh AM.(2006). “Socio-economic pathways to diet: modelling the association between socio-economic position and food purchasing behaviour”. Public Health Nutrition,9(3): 375-83. In contrast, disadvantage groups tend to involve cigarette smoking and excessive alcohol consumption,Smith KV, & Goldman N.(2007). “Socioeconomic differences in health among older adults in Mexico”. Social Science and Medicine,65(7): 1372-85. Pampel FC, Krueger PM, & Denney JT.(2011). “Socioeconomic Disparities in Health Behaviors”. Annual Review of Sociology,36: 349-70. in order to cope with stress in their lives.

These associations also vary by age and gender. Øvrum, Gustavsen, and Rickertsen explored how the income and education gradients in physical activity, smoking, consumption of fruit and vegetables and self-rated health vary with age among Norwegians aged 25 to 79.Øvruma A, Gustavsena GW, &Rickertsena K.(2014). “Age and socioeconomic inequalities in health: Examining the role of lifestyle choices”. Advances in Life Course Research,19: 1-13. The education gradient in smoking and in physical activity, as well as the income gradient in consumption of fruit and vegetables among elderly men, became smaller at older age; while only physical activity among elderly women grew stronger. Smith and Goldman showed reverse income gradients in obesity, smoking and drinking in Mexico, which was contrary to patterns in the industrialized world.Smith KV, & Goldman N.(2007). “Socioeconomic differences in health among older adults in Mexico”. Social Science and Medicine,65(7): 1372-85. A Canadian survey, by Denton and Walters, claimed that smoking and alcohol consumption were more important determinants of health(subjective health and functional health status)for men than women aged 20 and above, while body weight and being physically inactive were more important determinants of health for women than men aged 20 and above.Denton M, & Walters V.(1999). “Gender differences in structural and behavioral determinants of health: an analysis of the social production of health”. Social Science and Medicine,48(9): 1221-35. Prus and Gee found having an acceptable body weight was positively linked to health for eld erly Canadian women.Prus SG, &Gee E.(2003). “Gender differences in the influence of economic, lifestyle, and psychosocial factors on later-life health”. Canadian Journal of Public Health,94(4): 306-9. In China, adults aged 18 to 70 with a high SES were more likely to engage in a healthy lifestyle, being able to afford this, which in turn promoted their self-rated health.Wang FQ.(2012). “Socioeconomic status, lifestyle and health inequality”. Chinese Journal of Sociology,32: 125-143. Kim and his colleagues conducted a comparative study between China and the United States to understand health discrepancy issues cross-nationally.Kim S, Symons M, &Popkin BM.(2004). “Contrasting socioeconomic profiles related to healthier lifestyles in China and the United States”. American Journal of Epidemi-ology,159(2): 184-91. As SES(income and education)improved, lifestyle(diet, physical activity, smoking, and alcohol consumption)became less healthy in China.Pampel FC, Krueger PM, & Denney JT.(2011). “Socioeconomic Disparities in Health Behaviors”. Annual Review of Sociology,36: 349-70. Conversely in the United States, a higher SES was related to a healthier lifestyle. These findings are important in explaining corre-sponding age and gender patterns of inequality in health. However, a longitudinal study in America of 3617 non-institutionalized adults showed that cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and Body Mass Index(BMI)explained only a modest portion of the socioeconomic differences in health.Lantz PM, Lynch JW, House JS, Lepkowski JM, Mero RP, &Musick MA, et al.(2001). “Socioeconomic disparities in health change in a longitudinal study of US adults: the role of health-risk behaviors”. Social Science and Medicine,53(1): 29-40. That is, the higher prevalence of these four health-risk behaviors among lower SES groups was not the dominant mediating mechanism which could contribute to health ine-qualities by SES.

In fact, multiple liner regression analysis and logistic regression models, which are widely applied in prior studies, are not a good choice for mechanism studies, since these two kinds of analytical methods are not able to reflect indirect impacts, nor are they able to detect the covariation between independent variables and dependent variables, as well respective analyses would also yield inconsistent results. Most of the mechanism research on SES-health paid attention to the general population, with only a limited number of studies focused on elderly people. Whether healthy lifestyle could explain socioeconomic differences in health among elderly individuals is still unclear.